FLAG

DESCRIPTION

CAST

MOVIE ActionFLAG: Director's Edition - Issenman no Kufura no Kiroku

REVIEWS

• 

  Pockeyramune919

  60/100
  Despite an interesting point-of-view Flag does nothing more than "whelm."

  

  You know, I’m think I’m going to miss having Flag on my watching list after it being perched there for nearly half a year.

  Joking aside, the reason for the curiosity of a thirteen-episode anime taking me this long to watch perfectly encapsulates my feelings toward Flag, feelings that make this review an absolute pain to write:

  Meh

  Not “eh,” denoting iffiness, but “meh,” denoting pure indifference.

  

  Flag follows Saeko Shirasu, a 25-year old photojournalist. In the war-torn country of Uddiyana, she takes a picture of a woman praying behind a UN flag that’s being hoisted up. The picture propels both the flag and Shirasu into notoriety, with the flag now being seen as a symbol of peace to the Uddiyanans. Uddiyana looks like it’s on the pathway to peace until the flag is suddenly stolen by an insurgent group. A covert UN unit, SDC, is tasked with retrieving the flag. They’re joined by Shirasu who is offered the right to take pictures of the group. Detailing the daily life of Uddiyana during this time is Keiichi Akagi, Shirasu’s mentor.

  The most noteworthy thing about Flag is its perspective. The series is shown completely in a first-person point-of-view, contrasting with the third-person point-of-view of not only most anime, but most visual media as a whole. This POV is achieved via the two main characters’ profession: photography. Flag is shown via still photographs, videos, and the process of lining up a camera for a shot. Nearly everything you see is through the literal lens of Akagi and Shirasu. This gives Flag a very distinct look that sets it apart from other anime. It’s an odd feeling hardly ever getting to see the main characters, and it borders on unsettling that we just hear their disembodied voices, simply due to how used to the third-person POV we are. The POV is the reason I became interested in the anime, and what can I say, it delivered. The point-of-view itself proved compelling just due to how unique it was. Medium shots with characters seeming to be talking to you, yes you, the audience. It’s really just a treat to see because it shows a new way to show a story.

  

  The art style is realistic in gritty; fitting for an anime that the viewer seems to be a part of: both the POV and what we see through the POV lend the anime a sense of realism, like the events of the show could actually happen. Maybe it’s just my bias since I tend to prefer more realistic character designs (in terms of eyes and proportions), but I think the art style really helps set the anime apart.

  The show remains realistic despite the presence of mecha elements. The show features bipedal war robots, but they’re less powerful and more realistic-looking than the likes of Gundam or Metal Gears. These things feel like they could actually exist and I enjoy the care that was made to make them feel an organic part of the world. They’re CGI, but perhaps to the art style, it doesn’t look bad.

  

  So, the POV’s good, the art’s good, the music’s fine, so why am I so unmoved regarding the anime?

  I can’t exactly put my finger on why I found the anime so boring and that’s exactly what you don’t want in a review, where your job is to put your finger on something, describing precisely how it made you feel.

  Maybe it was the characters. They seemed kind of generic and not very compelling. Sure, some had clear goals such as proving that you can make it when coming from a war-torn country, but I still feel like we don’t really know the characters that well, and if we do, I just couldn’t muster a care about them.

  Maybe it was how neatly everything wrapped up at the end of each episode - no cliffhangers, no lingering questions. While the stakes were high, that urgency isn’t conveyed in the day-to-day lives of the characters themselves. Most times, the show felt like a glorified tour of the base, showing the lives of the characters. While there’s nothing wrong with this and could lend itself to being like a documentary, it didn’t feel like an informed documentary, it felt like a slice-of-life or someone gathering material for a documentary.

  Maybe it’s the same realism and subduedness that I somewhat commended earlier. Maybe the likes of Gundam and Metal Gear Solid have spoiled me, both which offer more gripping mecha action and “war is hell” sentiments. Maybe I just need flashiness in my anime, the mecha in the show were really underutilized and more overt instances of war being horrible might have made this show more captivating to me.

  Maybe it’s the ending, which is so much of a downer that I can’t help but feel a bit bitter. The only impact the anime has is via the ending, and it’s certainly not a good impact, I just leave feeling like the entire anime is pointless. And if I’m being honest, I’m sure I only care because I just watched it.

  

  While I’d say come for the unique POV, I can’t say it justifies slogging through twelve-episodes. It’s very flippant when I’m sure more care was put into Flag than the likes of Shield Hero, but I came out of Flag, feeling like I just witnessed a gimmick, a one-trick pony. And after I’m used to the fancy bells and whistles, there’s nothing left for me. Flag certainly isn’t a bad show, I still don’t know exactly what went wrong. But for whatever reason, it’s a boring show, and at the end of the day, what’s the difference?

  Here’s to hoping I don’t have to write another review that’s this unsure.

  6/10

  D-

  (Probably the only thing keeping this from a lower score is Jamieson Price’s (Akagi) silky smooth voice)

  Continue on AniList
• 

  MattSweatshirT

  70/100
  "The camera has been watching"

  ---

  2024 saw the death of the most journalists recorded in the past 30 years, as reported by the CPJ (link). 70% of these were at the hands of the IDF. Over just the past couple of years, more journalists have been killed in the Israel-Palestine conflict as were throughout the entirety of World War 2. By the most conservative estimates, the death toll in Palestine has reached over 48,000 since late 2023–60% of which were women and children. Millions are now still largely stranded without homes, food, water–any semblance of their prior livelihoods. They are now relegated back to day-to-day existence under even more severe occupation than before, not granted the dignity to build their own lives nor even the facade of hope that they will one day live free in their own land.

  “The camera has been watching”

  Have you?

  

  ---

  If unfamiliar with the history of the region FLAG is largely based around, the first episode may shock you with just how 1:1 of an analogy it feels like for what we’ve been seeing happen in Palestine from the news the past couple of years. But this is because this is an ongoing, constantly recurring thing. In Palestine in particular, we saw a similar cycle occur during the Second Intifada, which ended just a year before the release of this. As it goes on, the show becomes a less pointed analogy, building a nation and circumstance of its own that speaks moreso to a wide breadth of Western intervention in and around the middle east. There are places it certainly falters in this portrayal–which, if this were a normal anime that wasn’t so steeped in the reality it's attempting to reflect, might not be such a problem–but I’ll get more into that later.

  

  ---

  Now this is the part where I would like to talk about chief director Ryousuke Takahashi and some of the staff in more detail. About how he is one of the key progenitors of the Mecha genre from back in the 80s, and how this is probablyyyy something of a final bold creative statement and magnum opus near the end of his prolific career? About how exactly this fits into his extensive catalogue and carries on/differs from projects before it. About how his likely more thoughtful, politically emboldened approach to mecha and sci-fi clearly had an immense influence on the industry and on some of my personal favorite directors like Mamoru Oshii. But, I’ve yet to actually see anything else from him–I'm starting kind of in reverse order here. Maybe I’ll amend this bit once I have gone back and watched through things like Dougram and Votoms (in like a million years from now, given their length). Just know this guy’s pretty dang cool and important.

  ---

  FLAG’s largest focus is on its presentation as a found-footage style fictionalized documentary compiled entirely of video and photos captured by two journalists on the ground of an ongoing military conflict. And outside of the at times wonky looking CGI mechs, the production here is pretty ridiculous. It clearly doesn’t have the budget to achieve an incredible amount of fidelity in its background art, or super impressive character animation most of the time (which isn’t helped out by the fact that you can only find it in 480p). But it focuses on the small things, and goes for hyper-detailed facial expressions and animation for the characters instead. Its dedication to this function of realism and its documentary styling is almost absurd. The analogue look of the footage itself, the constant shakiness of the camera, the dynamic lighting and lens flare effect, the frequent zooming in and out of focus (which is the part that especially baffles me).

  

  Let alone just being a really cool framing device–they completely sell this found-footage look and realism in a way I don’t know if I’ve seen since Jin-Roh. It's like, why didn't they just make this in live action? It would’ve made so much more sense. But leave it to the real robot otakus to pursue an idea that makes no real sense to its extreme.

  ---

  Narratively, this is a tricky one to sort out. It's pretty straightforward on the surface. Our main character, who is a journalist, is assigned to follow a special team put together to retrieve a flag which was stolen by an insurgent group because it has come to be a symbol of peace the UN wants as leverage in the upcoming ceasefire proposal. From there, it doesn’t shy away from depicting some of the brutal aspects of the military occupation of this country. Tanks and soldiers line the streets. Satellite footage is used to monitor the local population. Residential districts are bombed indiscriminately.

  

  What is probably the biggest, glaring flaw throughout the show is the severely lacking perspective afforded to the victims in the whole conflict, the native people. We get pretty much one dedicated episode spent with a nomad group who is living moreso apart from the heart of the violence (which is easily the best episode of the series), but that's about it. This, however, kind of feels like it's by design. Given its whole framing device and a couple key moments, this feels like a story as much about the limitations of journalism as it is about the indispensable importance of it. Well, about some of the limitations of it and, more pressingly, how it can be shaped and narrativized by the powers that oversee it. Our perspective is that of an embedded journalist–someone who has been chosen by the military to come along with this special operation. This, along with a frequent critique of how the UN strives to silence and control the truth, displays the show’s understanding of the precarious position it’s in.

  

  The whole reason it’s presented as a found-footage style documentary in the first place rather than a completed one is because in the final episode the UN seizes our main character’s belongings and tape for fear of it making them look bad. It is, though, still kind of difficult to discern any confident messages the show has to offer by the end other than something to the effect of “real unadulterated journalism is super important and profound everybody”. It’s very possible, especially for those less familiar with the real-life history it’s pulling from, to walk away from this thinking the UN are still ultimately the unequivocal good guys here. They’re fighting to retrieve the flag, which is a symbol of peace after all–as silly of a mission that is in the first place, and which really outlines the problem with this kind of interventionism in itself. One key place it fails is in its portrayal of the ruling religious organization present in the nation. Its characterization of them as some ancient assassin death cult is at best lazy, and at worst a rather racist caricature. There’s one line at some point about the UN’s weaponization of the term “terrorist” to justify the killing of basically any and all people who get in their way–but there’s no real effort to explore resistance groups and reactionary religious organizations gaining prominence as a direct consequence of the violence of the occupation. The UN’s presence and intentions in the region are kept quite vague and justified with platitudes like “peacekeeping”. This rather accurately reflects how we in the west are presented these sorts of conflicts by the media–But ultimately, I would say FLAG’s almost obsessive focus on its presentation ends up getting in the way of it painting a more concrete and nuanced portrait of the conflict it's portraying. The narrative details and political substance its offering end up falling a little bit more to the wayside than such a serious, real-life circumstance like this deserves.

  ---

  This complete dedication to its presentation does end up working in its favor in some other ways as well, though. It’s a meticulously technical portrait of modern day warfare. So much time and effort is spent on the detailing of our mechs–on the look of the camera footage and computer screens–on the technology operated to fire missiles at enemy targets–on the minutia of its militarized perspective. This functions quite well to reflect the systematic dehumanization those involved have to undergo in order to carry out their orders. Become completely immersed in the detail and procedure of it all–the battlefield as seen through computer screens and infrared cameras–and you might just be able to forget that what you’re doing is the mass slaughter and displacement of a people.

  

  Our focus is largely relegated to this excessively mechanical view of things. We only get scraps of characters’ personalities and motivations, and that’s mostly limited to those within the special operation group our main character is following. It’s difficult to fully tell the show’s intentions with this, but the humanity that is afforded to these characters feels almost entirely upended to me by the wider context it exists within. It all feels almost fleeting by the end. It’s, again, not ultimately written in the most nuanced way, but it's still a compelling, circuitous journey to go on and try to figure out.

  ---

  FLAG’s documentary style can make the poetry that’s captured throughout often feel almost accidental. A shot of one of our ally Mechs holding one of the native people’s lambs that had run wild captive in its grasp. An offhand comment by a doctor about how the elderly natives living off the land have it rough, but they never complain. Moments that feel rich with metaphor and significance pass by in an instant–our camera holding on them equally as long as it will hold on the odd shot of a mountain or missile strike. It really is just a dedication to journalism through and through. It gives you all the images to sort through, lets you know there’s a bias and limitation in the perspective even its showing, and allows you to relate it to reality and unpack the significance of it all as you will.

  

  ---

  It’s an ultimately quite puzzling little series. Its biggest strengths end up creating some of its most crippling weaknesses. An anime that so badly wants to be live-action, but if it were live-action as is it really wouldn’t be very good. Does it really believe in the “peace” that the titular flag is meant to represent? I don’t think so, given our rather tragic ending where bombings occur again just weeks after the ceasefire is agreed upon. Does it have the courage to clearly identify the military occupation as the root of the conflict and violence? Also definitely not. What it does offer, however, is still an incredibly important perspective through a ridiculously impressive production. Real robot otakus all grown up (GONE WOKE, if you will), shifting their focus to real world conflict and the importance of war-time journalism. It’s no flawless, dialectical breakdown of the war economy and neo-colonialism, but it’s a bold effort and a rad little piece of anime history nonetheless.

  

  Here are a couple really incredible places working to provide life-saving aid for those currently suffering in palestine that you can support if you are able:

  https://www.anera.org/
  https://www.palestinercs.org/en
  https://upaconnect.org
  https://www.mecaforpeace.org/

  ---

  Continue on AniList

SIMILAR ANIMES YOU MAY LIKE

• ANIME

  DramaPlanetes
• ANIME

  ActionCanaan
• MOVIE

  DramaKidou Keisatsu Patlabor 2: the Movie
• ANIME

  DramaGasaraki
• ANIME

  ActionSoukou Kihei Votoms
• ONA

  ActionGodzilla: Singular Point
• MOVIE

  ActionGyakusatsu Kikan
• MOVIE

  MysteryHarmony
• ANIME

  ActionSpeed Grapher
• ANIME

  ActionBlade
• ANIME

  ActionX-Men
• ANIME

  ActionWolverine